enzosoler.comreviews 08bench 9 devices
Tested for 2 weeksPublished Updated

Gawfolk GF005 review: the Gawfolk I don't recommend

4.0
Overall scoreout of 10
Should you buy it?No. Buy the Gawfolk GF270J instead.

An interesting 3:2 panel undone by a connection problem and a screen that loses to its cheaper sibling.

$149.99at time of writing

Buy if

Almost nobody. At a deep discount, maybe, as a portrait screen for Slack and docs, if you can live with its habits.

Skip if

Anyone who expects the monitor to be recognized every time they plug it in. Buy the Gawfolk GF270J instead.

Scores by test

Image quality5
Text clarity for work6
Reliability and connectivity3
Value4
Gawfolk GF005 rotated into portrait on my desk, with a microphone arm to its left and the edge of a second monitor below it

I bought this with my own money. Every product here did weeks of my workdays before I scored it. If you buy through a link on this page, I may earn a commission. How I test

How I used it

I bought the GF005 myself, at the same time I was setting up my new main monitor, the Gawfolk GF270J. This one runs vertical on my desk, rotated into portrait, as the second screen for Slack, email, and sometimes a YouTube video. It's on about 15 hours a day because my whole desk is.

I went looking for this shape on purpose. The GF005 is a 3:2 panel, 3840 x 2560 instead of the standard 16:9, and I wanted something squarer for documents and chat. On paper, a cheap 4K 3:2 monitor in portrait is a great second screen. That's the pitch I bought.

macOS display settings showing the GF005 at 2560 x 3840 in portrait

The connection problem

This is the reason for the score, so it comes first.

What happens. Very frequently, my Mac doesn’t recognize the GF005.

What brings it back. I pull the DisplayPort cable, plug it back in, and switch inputs on the monitor. Then the Mac sees it.

What I tried. It happens with two different cables, both from a brand I trust, so I don’t think the cable is the problem. I updated the monitor’s firmware. I also tried HDMI. Everything above happened on DisplayPort, which is how it stays connected day to day.

How long I saw it. Across the two weeks of this review, on a monitor that’s on about 15 hours a day. I can’t give you an exact count, only that it was very frequent.

A monitor has one job, and this one needs a ritual to do it. Its sibling, the GF270J, sits on the same desk, connected to the same Mac, and had no recognition problem during its own two-week review. Whether your computer sees a cheap monitor every time is the check no spec sheet lists, and it’s the main check in my guide to buying a cheap monitor from a brand you don’t know.

What it gets right

The shape is the reason to consider it. In portrait, a 3:2 panel gives you a tall screen that fits a full email thread or a long Slack conversation without feeling like a narrow strip. No mainstream brand sells this shape at this price. The panel is about 15.5 inches tall, about the height of a 32-inch 16:9 screen, on roughly the width of a 27. The math is in my 27-inch or 32-inch guide, and my two-monitor MacBook guide covers when a vertical second screen is worth it.

And to be fair to it, when it’s connected and running, it does the second-screen job. Slack and email have lived on it all day, every day, for two weeks.

That’s the list.

What could be better

  • The screen loses to its cheaper sibling. Next to my Gawfolk GF270J, this panel is dimmer and the image is not as crisp. It’s also 60Hz against the 27’s 160Hz. I knew the refresh rate going in, but the overall image gap surprised me.
  • The squareness undersells itself. 3:2 is the reason I bought it, and in practice it doesn’t feel very square at all. If you’re imagining something dramatically different from a normal monitor, temper that.

How it compares

This is the rare review where the direct competitor is sitting right next to the product, from the same brand. I own both. The GF270J gives you a brighter, crisper 4K image at 160Hz and was flawless across its two-week review. The GF005 gives you an unusual shape, a worse image, and a connection ritual.

At list price the GF005 is the cheaper of the two, about $150 against about $300, though I ended up paying more for it than for the 27. Even at half the price, I’d point you to the 27. Knowing what I know now, I would have just bought two of those. Before buying any Gawfolk, read what its warranty actually covers. The full head-to-head, with both spec sheets side by side, is in Gawfolk GF270J vs GF005.

Specs

These are the maker's published figures unless a line says it comes from my own use.

Panel
28-inch IPS, 3840 x 2560
Aspect ratio
3:2
Refresh rate
60Hz
Ports
DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0

Final verdict

I don't recommend this monitor to anybody, unless you find it at a huge discount and specifically want a cheap portrait screen for docs and chat, with the habits I described.

I still use it every day, honestly because I bought it. When I upgrade, this one goes to my mother, who doesn't expect as much from things as I do. That's the most accurate review score I can give it.

If you want a Gawfolk, buy the GF270J. That one earned its recommendation. This one is the reason I check twice before trusting a spec sheet from a brand I otherwise like.

More reviews

All reviews

Questions about this one? Ask me on LinkedIn.

Message me

One email when a review goes up. Unsubscribe from any of them.