enzosoler.comreviews 08bench 9 devices
Tested for 3+ yearsPublished Updated

HyperX SoloCast (original) after three years: great up close, wrong above your monitor

7.0
Overall scoreout of 10
Should you buy it?Yes, if you talk right into it.

A good budget mic when it sits close to your mouth, and a poor fit for a setup above the monitor.

$59.99US list price at launch

Buy if

Anyone on a budget who can keep the mic within about 15 cm of their mouth, including people who make a lot of cold calls.

Skip if

Anyone who wants to mount the mic above the monitor or sit back from it.

Scores by test

Sound up close8
Sound at 30 cm3
Design and build8
Connection8
Value8
The SoloCast standing on my desk mat

I bought this with my own money. Every product here did weeks of my workdays before I scored it. If you buy through a link on this page, I may earn a commission. How I test

How I used it

I bought the original HyperX SoloCast myself in early 2023. It replaced a very cheap mic, and it was my first proper one. I have used it almost every workday since, on client calls and cold calls. It's always on. I've run it both through a USB hub and straight into the Mac.

What it gets right

Up close, it sounds good. When I speak straight into it from about 15 cm, my voice comes through full and clear on calls. That’s the setup where this mic earns its place on my desk, and it’s the one I’d recommend.

For cold calls, it’s the setup I want: the mic close, my voice direct into it.

The design is sleek. The top and middle sections look good to me, and I like how it looks on the desk.

What could be better

  • It has to sit very close to your mouth. Once I moved it above my monitor, about 30 cm from me, people on calls said I sounded too far away, and some couldn’t hear me well.
  • The distance problem is the main reason I’m moving on from it. The mic didn’t change. My setup did, and this one doesn’t tolerate it.

I didn’t put a different mic above the monitor. These days I take calls on my AirPods Max and my AirPods Pro 3, so the mic I talk into now is in my ears. I haven’t run a side-by-side test of how they sound against the SoloCast, so I won’t rank them.

Height above the monitor turns out to be the same argument on the video side of a call, which is why I wrote about using an iPhone as a webcam instead of buying one for work calls.

How it compares

The original launched at $59.99. HP’s SoloCast 2 came out in August 2025 at the same $59.99, with 96 kHz sampling and a boxier design. I haven’t used the SoloCast 2, so I can’t say how it sounds. If you’re buying now, compare the two on the features that matter to you. If your mic has to sit above the monitor, my microphone guide for video calls covers the boom-arm route.

Tech Advisor reviewed the original in 2022 and called it “a great first step into the world of USB mics,” especially for the price. In my use, the same holds with one condition: it has to be close.

Should you buy it?

Yes, if you’re on a budget, you want a dedicated USB mic, and you can keep it close to your mouth. It’s a good choice for cold calls and for anyone who talks directly into the mic.

No, if you plan to mount it above your monitor or sit back from it. Your voice will sound distant, and you’ll spend your calls asking people to repeat themselves.

Specs

These are the maker's published figures unless a line says it comes from my own use.

Pattern
Cardioid
Bit depth
16-bit
Sample rate
Up to 48 kHz
Weight
261 g (without base)
Connection
USB-C to USB-A, 2 m cable included

Final verdict

For my current setup, I wouldn't buy it again at today's price. That says more about how my desk changed than about the mic itself. It's a good microphone when it's used the way it's meant to be used, and it would be unfair to call it bad.

Buy it if you want a sleek, budget USB mic and you'll keep it close. Skip it if you need it at a distance. For me, it comes down to where the mic sits.

More reviews

All reviews

Questions about this one? Ask me on LinkedIn.

Message me

One email when a review goes up. Unsubscribe from any of them.